Skip to main content

BREAKING THE BARRIERS ( OR NOT?)

 


Breaking the Barriers (or not?)

By Anannya Gupta


“Out of the huts of history’s shame

I rise

Up from a past that’s rooted in pain

I rise

Leaving behind nights of terror and fear

I rise

Into a daybreak that’s wondrously clear

I rise 

I rise”


A poem written by Maya Angelou in 1978 during the ending years of the second wave of Feminism which successfully campaigned for women’s right to work among others stands as true for today’s women as it did back then because although we seemed to have progressed on the surface, much has in reality gone far from what it was. This I seek to prove with two phenomena currently operational in the job industry especially against women in the workforce. 


The First one has of late begun to get recognition. It being none other than Glass ceiling. This phrase was coined by Marilyn Loden at a 1978 Women's Exposition in reference to a panel discussion about women in the workforce. Like the term suggests, glass ceiling refers to an invisible barrier that restricts how high you can advance, in our case advance in ranks, in the job market. In other terms, it refers to situations where women (or people from other marginalised sections) are prevented from holding executive ranks only by virtue of their identities. 

Delayed promotions, preferential promotion to male counterparts, not receiving equal pay for equal work, isolation at work, experiences of micro aggression are some of the ways in which it operates and also reflects the consequences it can have for women. 


Although it would be enticing to think that women have now been breaking through the glass ceiling, the extent to which it still survives is quite shocking.


The most striking example of its manifestation that has survived till date would probably be of the American President. America has not seen a woman president in the more than 275 years of its existence as a democracy. And the results of the 2024 elections are all set to continue this chain.


Not only the US, the UN Women report recently revealed that a staggering 113 countries in the world have never had a woman lead them. And this is just one domain. Countless other fields with similar statistics still await their due attention. 


Over the years, many solutions, like Blind auditions, have been suggested. But to implement any, we must first come out of the mindset that assumes we have progressed enough. As a matter of fact, we have not. We still have a long and tiring journey to cover. I will further substantiate this claim with a second and even more interesting (and disturbing) phenomenon: that of a Glass Cliff. 


This phenomenon explains what happens after the glass ceiling is finally shattered or inversely why it was broken in the first place. 


Prima Facie, it might appear a useless exercise. Afterall, a woman becoming a CEO of a major MNC, for instance, should be perceived as good news and as a sign of progress. What’s the need for probing anything here? No, not if she is being set up for deliberate failure. 


Let’s consider it this way. Suppose there is a battalion at war, and in the immediate battle they are going to fight, they know their commander will most definitely be dead. So they decide to appoint a woman to lead them. Not because they have faith in her, this is what they want others (including her) to believe, but so that they can ensure that their male commanders can return back home valiant once she is killed off and the war ends. 


This is exactly what happens when a glass cliff plays out in the labour market. This trend was brought forward not too long back, in 2005, by researchers, Michelle Ryan and Alex Haslam at the University of Exeter, United Kingdom in a report, wherein they evaluated the performance of 100 companies included in the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 100 Index before and after women were appointed board members in response to and in order to refute a report published earlier which claimed that placing women at leadership positions was detrimental to a company.


In their report they found that when a company was seen to be doing poorly, when its chances of survival looked bleak, they resorted to appointing women to executive positions. Using them as scapegoats, they shielded their “prominent” male counterparts and provided ground for claiming that the glass ceiling is in fact a protective shield. In metaphorical terms, setting them up for failure meant the women were being pushed off a cliff.


The most famous example of this has been the appointment of Marissa Mayer as the CEO of Yahoo. Marissa was appointed CEO of the company in 2012 at a time when there was little hope of saving the giant and promptly fell off the glass cliff. Over the years, in fact, this has become quite prevalent and has left little in the name of a solution behind it.


It might be noted here that even Twitter (Now X), gained a woman CEO only recently, when there were talks of its dwindling future post acquisition by Elon Musk. Whether or not it will turn into another textbook example of a glass Cliff remains to be seen.


But one thing can be said for sure, the future of women in the labour market still looks less than promising unless we recognise the need for immediate actions for the women to finally break the barrier and not emerge as a glass cliff.


Bibliography:

https://builtin.com/diversity-inclusion/glass-ceiling#:~:text=The%20term%20'glass%20ceiling'%20refers,due%20to%20these%20same%20barriers.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/glass-ceiling.asp


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STORY WRITING COMPETITION

30 WORDS STORY WRITING COMPETITION   THEME- ' A WOMAN IN BUS' RULES: 1. You can submit a story or a snippet word limit- 30 words . 2. Story/snippet should be strictly original and only in English . 3. The entry should not contain any obscene, provocative, defamatory, sexually explicit,  hate inciting, or otherwise objectionable or inappropriate content. 4. Anonymity is not permitted. The participant should use their registered name and mail id to submit their response. SUBMISSION PROCEDURE: 1. Theme for the competition is - 'A WOMAN IN BUS' . Your story/snippet should revolve around this given theme. 2. Type your entry in the comment section . 3. One participant can only submit one entry . 4. A time window of 40 minutes will be given to submit your entries in the comment section after which no entry will be entertained. 5. Deadline for receiving entries is 4th Feb, 2:40pm . CRITERIA FOR WINNER: 1. Entry should fulfill all the terms and conditions of the competition ...

ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT

India is a country with one of the largest youth population in the world. More than 62% of the population is in the working age group. According to some estimates, around 250 million people would be joining the workforce in the next decade. This will greatly enhance the degree of competition, which would eventually lead to, as Darwin said, “Survival of the Fittest”. Employees would be required to have more and better skills than they originally need to survive.  Not only this, globalisation too has played a major role in reflecting the need for a better, skilled workforce, both for the developed and developing nations. It has also been observed that nations with highly skilled human capital tend to have higher GDP and per capita income levels and they adjust more effectively to the challenges and opportunities of the world of work and jobs.  Against this backdrop, India is driving unique initiatives to convert its demographic potential into a dividend that will fuel the countr...

ABOUT US, FROM US

“No one is born a good citizen; no nation is born a democracy. Rather, both are processes that continue to evolve over a lifetime.Young people must be included from birth. A society that cuts itself off from its youth severs its lifeline; it is condemned to bleed to death.”   - Kofi Annan. It is the youth of today that moulds the future of tomorrow. It is them who have to live through the consequences of policies taken today and this makes it unconditional, but imperative to give their words a voice and equip them with few skills that good governance of tomorrow calls for, namely, critical thinking, analytical flair and research capabilities which shall enhance their prudence as torch bearers of the better future envisaged by all. And the responsibility for this falls on the shoulders of centres of education which impart excellency to the youth blooming under their wings. Miranda House ...