Skip to main content

Liberal Rights to Abortion in a Patriarchal Context

By Sahaana Ramesh

Views expressed in this article are purely personal.

The recent split verdict delivered by the Supreme Court on a petitioner’s request to terminate her 26 week old pregnancy has brought India’s abortion rights to the centre stage once again. Her plea was rejected on grounds that she had crossed the 24 week mark and allowing her to terminate her pregnancy would be a violation of sections 3 and 5 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act. Until the 1970s, abortion was illegal and a punishable offence under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code wherein the pregnant person seeking abortion could face three years of imprisonment and a fine. The setting up of the Shantilal Shah Committee in the mid 1960s laid the first stone for legalising abortion in India. In 1964, the Committee headed by medical practitioner Dr. Shantilal Shah, suggested the liberalisation of abortion laws in India, which was to help in reducing unsafe abortions and decrease maternal mortality in the country. Based on the report submitted by the committee, a medical termination of pregnancy bill was introduced in both houses of the parliament in August 1971 and The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act came into force on April 1, 1972. This act sets the gestational limit for abortion at 20 weeks with approval of two doctors, beyond which abortions may only be performed, barring a court order to the contrary, when there is risk to the life of the pregnant person. Furthermore, the Act offers protection to registered medical practitioners for any injury caused to the pregnant person during an abortion procedure as long as the procedure was carried out according to the provisions of the MTP Act.

According to a study titled ‘The MTP 2020 Amendment Bill: anti-rights subjectivity’ published in the Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Journal, the primary purpose of the MTP Act, 1971 was “population control and family planning’’. The law, the study said, was “doctor centric and over medicalised abortion, stripping pregnant persons of their right to bodily and decisional autonomy and vesting the decision to abort with the doctor”. Over time, several amendments have been made to the act in 2003 and subsequently in 2021 that expanded the scope of the Act by extending the permissible period of gestation to 24 weeks and included within its purview unmarried women as well. Prior to the 2021 amendment, abortion was legally sanctioned solely for married women under any circumstances. Though the amendment was more inclusive than its predecessor law, it still fails to include LGBTQ persons within its ambit. Moreover, the discretionary powers of the courts in cases of pregnancies exceeding 24 weeks have produced very inconsistent results with some courts being progressive and others not. A Pratigya campaign study showed that between 2016-2019, a total of 194 writ petitions were filed by women for medical termination of their pregnancies in the SC and High Courts all over India and even though each case emerged from a uniquely disturbing set of conditions, the judgements were immensely varied. According to Pratigya, this lack of uniformity “dilutes the credibility of a legislation that affects the lives and bodies of women. It also makes women lose faith in the judiciary and its ability to recognise the choice of women in what happens to their bodies.” 

In light of these circumstances, it is evident that the high moral ground assumed by Indians with respect to abortion laws in our country is very flimsy. This was especially the case when feminists and medical practitioners all over the world were condemning the overturning of Roe vs Wade in the United States of America that stripped pregnant persons in the USA of legal protection and vested individual states with the power to grant or curtail abortion rights. Indians, during this time, were seen hailing their abortion laws. While we may be several steps ahead of other countries that refuse to provide even the bare minimum to its citizens, we need to introspect on the shortcomings of our own abortion laws and keep working to fix them. The first step in that direction ought to be recognising and weeding out the heteronormative and patriarchal bias in our abortion laws and subsequently formulating a rights based framework that holds bodily autonomy of pregnant persons as paramount.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STORY WRITING COMPETITION

30 WORDS STORY WRITING COMPETITION   THEME- ' A WOMAN IN BUS' RULES: 1. You can submit a story or a snippet word limit- 30 words . 2. Story/snippet should be strictly original and only in English . 3. The entry should not contain any obscene, provocative, defamatory, sexually explicit,  hate inciting, or otherwise objectionable or inappropriate content. 4. Anonymity is not permitted. The participant should use their registered name and mail id to submit their response. SUBMISSION PROCEDURE: 1. Theme for the competition is - 'A WOMAN IN BUS' . Your story/snippet should revolve around this given theme. 2. Type your entry in the comment section . 3. One participant can only submit one entry . 4. A time window of 40 minutes will be given to submit your entries in the comment section after which no entry will be entertained. 5. Deadline for receiving entries is 4th Feb, 2:40pm . CRITERIA FOR WINNER: 1. Entry should fulfill all the terms and conditions of the competition ...

ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT

India is a country with one of the largest youth population in the world. More than 62% of the population is in the working age group. According to some estimates, around 250 million people would be joining the workforce in the next decade. This will greatly enhance the degree of competition, which would eventually lead to, as Darwin said, “Survival of the Fittest”. Employees would be required to have more and better skills than they originally need to survive.  Not only this, globalisation too has played a major role in reflecting the need for a better, skilled workforce, both for the developed and developing nations. It has also been observed that nations with highly skilled human capital tend to have higher GDP and per capita income levels and they adjust more effectively to the challenges and opportunities of the world of work and jobs.  Against this backdrop, India is driving unique initiatives to convert its demographic potential into a dividend that will fuel the countr...

PORNOGRAPHY AND THE STATUS OF WOMEN

 According to the Oxford dictionary, the most widely circulated dictionary in the country, the term “Pornography” is defined as “books- magazines- films, et cetera, that describe or show sexual acts which cause sexual excitement”, and indeed, acts of pornography incite sexual arousal among groups of satisfied consumers/ viewers. The term “pornography” has been derived from the Greek word, porni, which means “whore or prostitute” and graphein, which stands for “to write”, therefore, in colloquial language, this would sum up to “the writing about prostitutes''. The definition for prostitutes will initiate a whole new level of discussion because a “prostitute” is someone who engages in sexual activities in return of payment- a business venture with a producer and a consumer. However, prostitution and the selling of sexually explicit content for sexual arousal have been mocked, heavily neglected, and largely treated as a taboo better not spoken about for centuries. With the advent ...