Skip to main content

Analysis of Migration Laws: Peace or Conflict?

How did migrant labour laws failed migrants? Ignored and disheartened, labourers since ages have faced discrimination at the hands of authorities, capitalists, as well as civic societies. All that was happening beneath the ice surfaced when honourable Prime Minister  announced  nationwide lockdown for the containment of the virus, which hit the nation in  the  last  week  of  March. He  gave four hours to the citizens to prepare for a locked life.  The  chaos, following the announcement  birthing from the lack of coordination  between  Centre  and  State, of whose  prime  example  being  of Interstate migrant labourers, who similar to mass exodus were now returning to their native homes, thus throwing light on the cracks in the implementation of highly ambitious welfare acts. Some of them being, Interstate Migrant Workmen Act, 1979; Minimum Wages Act,

1948; the Contract Labour  (  Regulation and  Abolition) Act,  1970;  The  Equal  Remuneration Act, 1976; and, the  Building  and  Other  Construction  Workers (Regulation  of  Employment  and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. Labour, being a subject of concurrent  list  has  a  girth  of  laws aspiring for the betterment of workers both  in  organised and unorganised sectors.  In  total,  there are 100 state and 40 central  laws,  but  an  ironical situation arises  when  none  of  these  could assure stranded labourers minimum wages, healthcare, a shelter to stay, food and other basic amenities, in order to stop their outflow.  The  grimace picture  of  labourers'  journey  on  foot towards their hundred kilometres away home, continued to flash on tv screens, showing how the microbial virus has come with its own kind of class divide. Earning their daily wages by pulling rickshaws, working at a construction site, selling  vegetables, working  in  factories  and  at  other places, these daily bread earners  saw  their  survival  getting  hard in  enclosed  spaces,  with no earning and no support from the government,  alongside the  fear of  virus  looming  large  over  their heads.  The  estimated  10  crore  stranded  workforce,  in spite  of being  accounting  for  10% of national GDP continue to face barriers in their home as well as host states. Interstate  Migrant Workmen Act, 1979. One of the major laws, recognizing the unique category  of  interstate  migrants though  has  a commendable  list  of  rules  mentioned  in it,  but  due  to  its  ineffective implementation, it proved harmful to the migrants. The  law  recognizes  interstate  workers  as illiterate, unorganized, working under extremely adverse  conditions,  therefore  see  administrative and legislative arrangements both in the home and host states of the workers, necessary.

Source- Unsplash By-Atul Pandey

Employment of Interstate migrant workmen in any establishment is prohibited unless it's duly registered  under this  Act.  It's  applicable  on establishments  with  5  or  more  interstate workers. The conditions laid  down  in  the  Act,  demands the  contractor  to  obtain  a  license  from  an authority of both the states involved. A certificate of registration  before  the  employment  of interstate migrants which also contains the arrangement list under which the recruitment would happen, the remuneration payable, hours of  work  and other  basic  amenities  to  be provided.  A Chief Labour Commissioner( CLC) from either  of  the states  visit  the  site  to  ensure  compliance  of the conditions proposed. Huge paperwork is thus, required by the recruiters  and  as  well  the officers appointed to keep a check on the  smooth functioning  of  the laws. In states  like Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Delhi,  etc.  where  the  cost  of  local  labour  is  high,  they engage in underreporting of the labourers. The official data is collected by the state governments from employers and licensed contractors who recruit migrant labourers. Underreporting of recruitments often happen at this stage, when contractors provide a wrong data where a lot of labourers are not registered. This leads to a poor data collection, which is relied on by policymakers. What went wrong?

The inability of our Prime Minister, to foresee the mass the exodus of migrants and the inability of governments ( central and  state)  and  bureaucracy  to  deal  with  it  show that  the  situation  wasn't in their  list,  this,  might  have  happened  because  the  400  million  population  of  such  workers never made it on government papers. This large population doesn't have basic facilities of PDS and healthcare under government hospitals, unlike farmers who benefit (  though  inadequate) from several government  schemes  and  labourers  in rural  areas  who  benefit  from  MNREGA, due  to their inability to acquire an  Unique  Identity  Card  which  requires  a  permanent  address whereas they continue to  cross  boundaries  of  states  in  a  month or  two  in the  search of  a  better livelihood. And, it would be disrespectful to say that what they  want  is  just, a  life free  from starvation and few pennies  in their  hands,  which  could  have  been  easily  availed under  MNREGA in rural areas. They want something more than a meal twice a day which is ‘better opportunities’ to earn themselves a meaningful life. It is a  huge  shame  in  the  part  of  both  the  home  and  host states who neither could assure  good  working  conditions  and  basic  amenities  to  these hardworking people, nor could respect their  work  which  helped  them  in gaining the desired economy at low rates and no facilities. Apart from the  conscious  problems,  the  ineffectiveness  of law reveals the institutional problem of too much relying on socialist laws and its  socialist enforcement. As  legal  coercion  with  ideal conditions  has  been  seen  as  adequate  for  creating good outcomes but not covered under these laws are,  basic  flaws  like  compliance  costs, government capacity for enforcement, corruption and most importantly counterproductive consequences. For example- the onerous requirements set out  in  the  Act,  incentivize  contractors and inspectors to under-report interstate workmen rather than to register  them. This leads to a failed attempt at formalizing this highly informal sector.  Another  idea  of,  providing  the  migrants with  unique  identification  and linking  it  with  JAM  trinity  ( Jan-  Dhan,  Aadhar  and  Mobile)  to bring them under the formal  net  and enabling  them  for  direct  cash  transfers  ignores  the  very  fact that only 345 million  are  availing smartphone  facilities,  rests  still  have  a  long  way  ahead of them. What is being done? As a part of reforming labour laws, a Bill has been introduced in the Parliament called the Occupational  Safety,  Health  and  Working  Conditions  Code  of  2019  that seeks to merge 13 labour laws,  Interstate  Migrants  Workmen  Act,  1979  is  one  of  the  laws  that are being merged. This also ignores the uniqueness of migrant  workmen and  count them in domestic labourers. The changes,  few  state  government  has  proposed  under  the  light  of pandemic and flattened GDP curve because of it, including suspension of  labour  laws  in states  like Uttar Pradesh,  Madhya Pradesh  and  others  to  attract  investments  reflects  how  less  concerned our governments are for these miserable workers. The model of Odisha government and Kerala government can be taken into consideration which have  set  up  helplines  like  Shramik  (  labour force) Sahayata to the migrant workers pioneered schemes such as Kerala Migrant Workers Welfare Scheme 2010, respectively. The former help migrant workers in two specific areas: 1. Legal rights 2. Financial  awareness, while  the  latter  offers  financial  support  for  treatment  of  migrants for ailments, grant for their children's children in Kerala and retirement benefits to those  who complete five years under the scheme and migrant labourer provident funds. Such models can be replicated by other states at provincial and regional levels and by the centre at the national level.

  

REFERENCES


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.orfonline.org/expert- speak/migrant-labour-crisis-must-push-structural-reforms- 68874/&ved=2ahUKEwiihIqA8vLrAhUIbn0KHXTHDmkQFjAIegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw2gFajj8r1bJUPbNt- 3G_az&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.thewire.in/article/labour/lockdo wn-migrant-workers-policy- analysis/amp&ved=2ahUKEwjxhZn48vLrAhVexTgGHWhHBl4QFjABegQIDhAJ&usg=AOvVaw0g25lyTIZ9hi RPgmSpCKVA&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/c olumns/india-lockdown-inter-state-migrant-workmen-act- 6400710/lite/&ved=2ahUKEwipvrfA8_LrAhXpxzgGHYGnDtQQFjACegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw0- rSRBfSnNIJy0F_Eg9NfJ&ampcf=1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.orfonline.org/expert- speak/migrant-labour-crisis-must-push-structural-reforms- 68874/&ved=2ahUKEwjxhZn48vLrAhVexTgGHWhHBl4QFjAIegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw2gFajj8r1bJUPbNt- 3G_az&ampcf=1&cshid=1600438957387 



WRITTEN BY ANJUMAN YADAV  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STORY WRITING COMPETITION

30 WORDS STORY WRITING COMPETITION   THEME- ' A WOMAN IN BUS' RULES: 1. You can submit a story or a snippet word limit- 30 words . 2. Story/snippet should be strictly original and only in English . 3. The entry should not contain any obscene, provocative, defamatory, sexually explicit,  hate inciting, or otherwise objectionable or inappropriate content. 4. Anonymity is not permitted. The participant should use their registered name and mail id to submit their response. SUBMISSION PROCEDURE: 1. Theme for the competition is - 'A WOMAN IN BUS' . Your story/snippet should revolve around this given theme. 2. Type your entry in the comment section . 3. One participant can only submit one entry . 4. A time window of 40 minutes will be given to submit your entries in the comment section after which no entry will be entertained. 5. Deadline for receiving entries is 4th Feb, 2:40pm . CRITERIA FOR WINNER: 1. Entry should fulfill all the terms and conditions of the competition

ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT

India is a country with one of the largest youth population in the world. More than 62% of the population is in the working age group. According to some estimates, around 250 million people would be joining the workforce in the next decade. This will greatly enhance the degree of competition, which would eventually lead to, as Darwin said, “Survival of the Fittest”. Employees would be required to have more and better skills than they originally need to survive.  Not only this, globalisation too has played a major role in reflecting the need for a better, skilled workforce, both for the developed and developing nations. It has also been observed that nations with highly skilled human capital tend to have higher GDP and per capita income levels and they adjust more effectively to the challenges and opportunities of the world of work and jobs.  Against this backdrop, India is driving unique initiatives to convert its demographic potential into a dividend that will fuel the country’s growt

ABOUT US, FROM US

“No one is born a good citizen; no nation is born a democracy. Rather, both are processes that continue to evolve over a lifetime.Young people must be included from birth. A society that cuts itself off from its youth severs its lifeline; it is condemned to bleed to death.”   - Kofi Annan. It is the youth of today that moulds the future of tomorrow. It is them who have to live through the consequences of policies taken today and this makes it unconditional, but imperative to give their words a voice and equip them with few skills that good governance of tomorrow calls for, namely, critical thinking, analytical flair and research capabilities which shall enhance their prudence as torch bearers of the better future envisaged by all. And the responsibility for this falls on the shoulders of centres of education which impart excellency to the youth blooming under their wings. Miranda House has